Download PDF (187.072375 MB)
PDF preview

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat or click here to download the PDF file.

Click here to download the PDF file.
Article with impact factor
Šimon, Martin

Multi-scalar geographies of polarisation and peripheralisation: A case study of Czechia

Šimon, Martin. 2017. „Multi-scalar geographies of polarisation and peripheralisation: A case study of Czechia.“ Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series 37 (3): 125-137. ISSN 1732–4254. [cit. 21.7.2017]. Dostupné z:

A key issue in socio-economic geography is to understand how regional and social polarisation shapes the territorial organisation of society. We argue that effects of polarisation are not translated simply and straightforwardly in a whole region, but vary to a large extent with respect to different types of accessibility areas. We applied the time-accessibility framework to classify a territory into urban, peri-urban, rural, and remote rural areas at a national and regional scale. Subsequently, we computed comparative indicators for this territorial classification, measuring three dimensions of peripherality for a period of thirty years. The analysis illustrates how polarisation and peripheralisation works at a detailed spatial level. A case study of the Ústí region shows re-polarisation and bi-polarisation of the region in its path from socialist urbanisation in the 1980s to regional peripheralisation in 2011. The use of the time-accessibility framework allows to assess regional changes within long-term and broader changes of core-periphery relations at national level and thus allows for a better understanding of the different nature of socialist and post-socialist peripheries. Finally, the article offers methodical procedures and tools allowing for a comparable research of polarisation and peripheralisation. Thus, it is responding to the call for more comparative research of peripheral areas in Europe.


urban and rural studies
social inequalities

Attached pictures

Fig. 1. Core-periphery typology of Czechia
Fig. 2. Changing core-periphery relations 1980-2011