Recently there have been pleas for STS to make a difference in how science policies are constructed and enacted. Much less remarked upon is the possibility that there may be troubling alignments between science studies and research policies in the form of shared conceptual, epistemological and methodological assumptions. Both have come to emphasise material outputsand visible activity, obscuring other processes, relationships and orderings involved in science work. This collection of papers focuses on these connections between STS and contemporary research policies. They explore empirical material from ‘otherepistemic places’ (disciplinary, geo-political and spatial) to foreground and critique what is privileged and rewarded by sciencepolicies. But they also seek to make a theoretical contribution to STS itself, showing how its early focus on the hard centres of global technoscience have been constitutive of its characteristic concerns, epistemologies -and blind spots. As science studies moves out of the lab andbeyond the heartlands of the political West and global North, we argue that acknowledging some problematic affinities between science studies and science policy is both a critical necessity and an opportunity for new insights.
Stöckelová, Tereza, Garforth, Lisa. 2012. „Science Policy and STS from Other Epistemic Places.“ Science Technology & Human Values 37 (2): 226-240. ISSN 0162-2439.
sociology of science